Showing posts with label postmodern. Show all posts
Showing posts with label postmodern. Show all posts

Confessional-historical

I know, I know, it's a seminary textbook, but it's fascinating stuff. To submit the Scripture as God's authoritative revelation and also hold to its historical facts is great for me to read. Christian Hartlich says it like this:

The fundamental theological axiom at work here can be understood in one sentence: Without an objective, ontic grounding for Christology in the resurrection event Christian faith has no basis. At the same time, however, there is also the desire – so far as possible – to proceed in a historical-critical way, in order to make the event of the resurrection of Jesus historically plausible.
In short, I believe that Christ imparted grace to me by defeating death in the resurrection, but I also believe that Christ's resurrection was an actual historical event. It might not sound like a big deal, but it's a big deal.

The fact that this guy said it in 1978 is also humbling because I am just now coming to these realizations. Slowly.

read more...

Knowing and being certain

As my Dad flew through town a couple of months ago, we briefly got on the subject of certainty and relational truth. As always, the debate was very respectful and fun. In the middle of it, I happened upon a really great truth and now I'm attempting to process it a little.

It came up that someone could know God, but only in a personally interpreted way, the same way I know my friend, Dallas. In this case, I could not make absolute claims about this friend like "Dallas is a gracious person." I could only truthfully say, "Dallas is gracious to me." It would always center on my perspective, and not on Dallas himself. In terms of knowing God, it was said that I can know God personally, but I cannot be certain of who He is. That's where I had a problem.

Stuck inside the cage of our own perspective, we can never know anything about God. We cannot be certain because we can never have all the facts about Him. I do not believe either of these statements because of one word: revelation. And even though I know it's not that easy, it is the beginning of understanding that we can make know God [and things about Him] outside of anyone's perspective, including our own. To illustrate this, I'll use a simple, three-person relationship consisting of Ann, Ben, and Cal. This is their [fictional] story.

Ann and Ben are great friends. Ann and Cal are also great friends. Ben and Call don't know each other as of yet. One day in a chance encounter, Ben and Cal meet and discover that they both know Ann. This is where the trouble begins.

Ben declares, "Ann is one of the mildest people I know. She wouldn't even hurt a fly." Ben then tells a story to illustrate his declaration. Cal interjects, "Really? The Ann I know is extremely violent and everyone is constantly fearful of her." Cal then shares a story about one of Ann's violent tirades. Ben and Cal go back and make sure they're speaking of the same person, and that the stories they told were recent, and they were.

The questions arises for both of them, "Who is Ann?" This is not merely one mood of Ann, but a totally different persona. Relationally, this is a problem that only Ann herself can rectify. Either she is an impostor to some degree, or one of her friends is wrong. There is no other option.

Back to reality. One person might say something like, "God would never let someone hurt themselves" while another says, "God just allowed my mother to commit suicide." Either God is an impostor to some degree, or one of them is wrong about God. There is no other option. The answer begins with revelation. Relationally, God is the only one who can clear His own Name, and He has... in revealing Himself to us through Scripture.

I know this isn't a complete treatment of this problem, but it's a beginning. The road I go down from here involve questions like: why is Scripture so difficult to interpret? What has God revealed about Himself in Scripture? Moreover, what about those who don't believe Scripture, what are they to understand? All really good questions. Hopefully, I'll get some good answers.

read more...

InCarnation Instant Breakfast

InCarnation Instant Breakfast is possibly the best title of a blog I've ever seen, and it's "the unofficial weblog for new types of missional communities in Canada." Anyone looking for the last frontier in missional church planting can find it blogged here.

Get on their site, give them some love.

read more...

What Vox Church is about


In my brief time leading an emerging-missional church, I have come across many stereotypes, both of me and my church. I have also come across some sabotage from other believers [and some pastors] in the form of slander and false gossip. I need to address this issue, but sometimes the rumors spread faster than anyone can cover.

For all those interested or mistaken or lied to about what exactly the emerging church movement is, please take a few moments and read this article. It is scholarly [in a good way] and respectful in its approach and dead on with its content.

Besides dispelling rumors, I also found it very helpful in explaining to my father that I'm a Christian, but not like many of the ones he sees on TV. Thank you, Scot.

read more...

One History of the Emerging Church

Thanks to the Tall Skinny Kiwi [Andrew Jones] for putting this together. This first installmentgoes all the way through the 80's.

Even if you're not into the Emerging Church per se, it's still a great read and full of adventure. I hope to be telling stories like these one day.

TSK's My History of the Emerging Church. Part One

Highlights:

"In 1985 I sold my car and bought a one way ticket to Europe..."

"Some of the electricians were interested in learning about God so once a week, after work, we gathered and studied the Bible. They all cracked open a can of beer and the event got stuck with the unfortunate name of 'Beer and Bible'."

"...when i was overseas on a trip, the elders decided to pull the plug on the 'contemporary service'. That was the last time I tried to start a 'church within a church' structure."

read more...

Emerging Movement: Future or Fad?

This is a thought-provoking article on the global emerging church movement. "The EM [emerging movement] is a missionally shaped ecclesiology that seeks to unite Christians for the sake of unleashing the gospel to change the world, rather than a theological movement designed to demand conformity on specific theological issues."

I think it describes well in theology, if not in practice, what we're doing over at Vox Church.

Download "Emerging Movement: Future or Fad?"

I found this article first on the blog of Andrew Jones, and saved it to read it later. Luckily, when the old site lost it, I still had it. Enjoy the read.

read more...

Focus on the strengths

Well, I'm at a conference called Emergent (or is it a conversation?) and I've learned the mighty lesson of leaving my weakness behind and spending more time on my strengths. I've even found a tool to help me do that.

That said, I really miss my wife and son badly and can't wait to get back home to see them. Getting back home is always so restful. I just hope I don't get lazy.

I think I'm going to start posting pictures soon. We'll see what we'll see. OK, seminars are starting...

As for the big change, so far so different

read more...